Towards a National AI Security Framework for Financial Infrastructure Protection
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence Security, Financial Infrastructure Protection, Critical Infrastructure Security, Adversarial Machine Learning, Trustworthy AI, Financial Risk Management, Federated Learning Security, Payment System Security, Cyber-Physical Financial Systems, National AI Security FrameworkAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in modern financial infrastructure, including real-time payment systems, anti–money laundering (AML) platforms, credit risk assessment engines, and cross-border settlement networks. As financial institutions accelerate digital transformation, AI-driven decision-making has become essential for ensuring operational efficiency, fraud detection, and systemic stability. However, the rapid adoption of AI technologies within critical financial systems has simultaneously introduced a new class of security vulnerabilities. Emerging threats such as adversarial machine learning, model poisoning, data manipulation, automated fraud orchestration, and AI-enabled cyberattacks pose significant risks to the integrity and resilience of financial infrastructure. These risks extend beyond individual institutions, creating the potential for cascading failures across interconnected financial ecosystems and posing systemic challenges to national economic stability [1]. Despite the growing importance of AI security in financial operations, there is currently no unified national-level framework that comprehensively addresses AI-related threats within financial infrastructure. Existing cybersecurity standards and AI governance models often operate in isolation, lacking integrated mechanisms that align technical safeguards, operational monitoring, and regulatory coordination across institutions. This fragmentation limits the ability of financial systems to respond effectively to sophisticated AI-driven threats and undermines the development of a consistent [2], trustworthy AI security posture at scale. The absence of a standardized national architecture further complicates collaboration among banks, regulators, and technology providers, creating gaps in visibility, accountability, and coordinated defense [3]. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a National AI Security Framework for Financial Infrastructure Protection. The framework introduces a multi-layered architecture designed to secure AI-enabled financial systems through integrated model protection, data integrity assurance, adversarial defense mechanisms, real-time monitoring, and cross-institutional coordination [4]. At the technical level, the framework incorporates secure model development practices, privacy-preserving data sharing mechanisms, adversarial attack detection, explainable AI monitoring, and continuous risk assessment. At the governance level, it establishes mechanisms for inter-organizational collaboration, regulatory integration, and shared threat intelligence to support consistent security practices across financial ecosystems. By aligning technical safeguards with broader national risk management strategies, the framework enables financial institutions to proactively identify vulnerabilities, mitigate emerging threats, and maintain operational continuity in increasingly complex AI-driven environments [5]. The proposed framework also emphasizes alignment with national critical infrastructure protection priorities and trustworthy AI initiatives, providing a structured approach for integrating AI security into existing financial risk management and regulatory oversight processes. Through illustrative use cases in real-time payment networks, fraud detection systems, and cross-border financial transactions, this study demonstrates how a coordinated AI security architecture can enhance resilience, transparency, and trust across financial systems [6]. The framework is designed to be scalable and adaptable, supporting both individual institutional deployment and broader national-level coordination [7]. By establishing a unified and technically grounded approach to AI security, this research contributes to the development of a secure and resilient financial ecosystem capable of withstanding evolving technological and adversarial challenges. This study contributes toward building a resilient and trustworthy AI foundation for protecting national financial infrastructure [8].
References
Chen, H., et al. (2024). Threat detection driven by artificial intelligence: Enhancing cybersecurity with machine learning algorithms. Cybersecurity Innovations Conference, Nov. 2024, p. 45. https://doi.org/10.53469/wjimt.2024.07(06).09
Liu, Y., et al. (2021). Deep reinforcement learning for cybersecurity: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23(2), 1022–1048.
Wang, Y., et al. (2025). AI end-to-end autonomous driving. International Journal of Operations and Management Science Research, 8(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.53469/wjimt.2025.08(01).08
Papernot, N., et al. (2016). Transferability in machine learning: From phenomena to black-box attacks using adversarial samples. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 1–10).
Kaelbling, L. P., et al. (1996). Reinforcement learning: A survey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 4, 237–285.
Sutton, R. S., et al. (2018). Reinforcement learning: An introduction (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
Liu, Y., et al. (2023). Grasp and inspection of mechanical parts based on visual image recognition technology. Journal of Theory and Practice of Engineering Science, 3(12), 22–28.
Truong, N. B., et al. (2022). A comprehensive survey on digital twin for future networks and emerging services. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 24(4), 2253–2289.
Chen, W., et al. (2024). Applying machine learning algorithm to optimize personalized education recommendation system. Journal of Theory and Practice of Engineering Science, 4(1), 101–108.
Cheng, S., et al. (2023). Poster graphic design with your eyes: An approach to automatic textual layout design based on visual perception. Displays, 79, 102458.
Du, S., et al. (2024). Improving science question ranking with model and retrieval-augmented generation. In Proceedings of the 6th International Scientific and Practical Conference "Old and New Technologies of Learning Development in Modern Conditions".
Hashem, I. A. T., et al. (2021). The role of digital twin in cybersecurity: Opportunities and challenges. Future Generation Computer Systems, 115, 453–465.
Scarfone, K., et al. (2007). Guide to intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDPS) (NIST Special Publication 800-94). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Ferrag, M. A., et al. (2020). Privacy-preserving schemes for adversarial machine learning in cybersecurity: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 22(3), 1869–1895.
Lin, S., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence and electroencephalogram analysis: Innovative methods for optimizing anesthesia depth. Journal of Theory and Practice in Engineering and Technology, 1(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14457933
Huang, L., et al. (2017). Adversarial machine learning in cybersecurity: A tutorial. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security (pp. 1–10).
Wang, Z., et al. (2025). Intelligent construction of a supply chain finance decision support system and financial benefit analysis based on deep reinforcement learning and particle swarm optimization. International Journal of Management Science Research, 8(3), 28–41.
Al-Garadi, M. A., et al. (2020). A survey of machine and deep learning methods for cybersecurity. IEEE Access, 8, 122512–122531.
Schulman, J., et al. (2017). Proximal policy optimization algorithms. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 1–12).
Sangaiah, A. K., et al. (2022). Digital twin-driven cybersecurity for critical infrastructure: A systematic review. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(5), 3512–3524.
Bhuyan, M. H., et al. (2014). Network anomaly detection: Methods, systems and tools. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(1), 303–336.
Cheng, S., et al. (2024). 3D Pop-Ups: Omnidirectional image visual saliency prediction based on crowdsourced eye-tracking data in VR. Displays, 83, 102746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2024.102746
Tian, M., et al. (2023). The application of artificial intelligence in medical diagnostics: A new frontier. Academic Journal of Science and Technology, 8(2), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.54097/ajst.v8i2.14945
Jordan, M. I., et al. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245), 255–260.
Chu, D., et al. (2024). Research progress and challenges in end-to-end autonomous driving. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 1–29.
Wei, K., et al. (2024). Strategic application of AI in network threat detection using enhanced K-means clustering. Journal of Theory and Practice of Engineering Science, 4(2), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.53469/jtpes.2024.04(01).07
Lee, R. M., et al. (2016). Analysis of the cyber attack on the Ukrainian power grid (Report). SANS Industrial Control Systems.
Chew, J., et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence optimizes the accounting data integration and financial risk assessment model of the e-commerce platform. International Journal of Management Science Research, 8(2), 7–17.
Khan, M. M. R., et al. (2022). Digital twin-enabled cyber-physical systems: A review. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(1), 45–65.
Wang, Y., et al. (2025). Research on the cross-industry application of autonomous driving technology in the field of FinTech. International Journal of Management Science Research, 8(3), 13–27.
Gardner, M. T., et al. (2014). Using GENI for experimental evaluation of software-defined networking (SDN) resilience. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (pp. 391–396).
Hasan, S. R., et al. (2021). A survey on digital twin: Definitions, characteristics, applications, and design implications. IEEE Access, 9, 32091–32112.
Xu, J., et al. (2025). Adversarial machine learning in cybersecurity: Attacks and defenses. International Journal of Management Science Research, 8(2), 26–33.
Liu, Y., et al. (2024). Grasp and inspection of mechanical parts based on visual image recognition technology. Journal of Theory and Practice of Engineering Science, 3(12), 22–28.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rahul Mehta, Neal Patwar, Xiangang Wei, Emily Saunders, Xu Zhu, Jingwei Liu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
